Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author劉祐瑜en_US
dc.contributor.author王淑芬en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T01:05:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-26T01:05:36Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079939511en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/50285-
dc.description.abstract  過去文獻普遍認為多角化策略對公司價值會產生折價效果,其中原因大多被歸因為部門之間的交叉補貼效果所導致。然而過去文獻都忽略資金流動性的溢酬效應對「多角化折價」的直接影響,因此本研究利用2005到2010年之美國三大交易所─NYSE、Amex與NASDAQ的資料檢視此論點是否存在。結果顯示,公司的流動性溢酬越高的確可減輕多角化策略的折價效果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract  Value destruction by diversified firms relative to their focused competitors has been widely studied by prior literatures. This discount effect has been ascribed to many factors; among the most prominent of these explanations is the cross-subsidization effect between divisions resulted in diversified organizational form. However, the value-added effect of liquidity premium has been neglected by previous studies of corporate diversification. In our studies, we use data in the three main security exchanges in the United States, which are NYSE, Amex and NASDAQ in 2005 to 2010 for examining this contention. Our key finding is that higher level of liquidity premium mitigates diversification discount effect on firm value.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subject多角化zh_TW
dc.subject流動性溢酬zh_TW
dc.subject交叉補貼效果zh_TW
dc.subjectDiversificationen_US
dc.subjectliquidity premiumen_US
dc.subjectCross-subsidization effecten_US
dc.title多角化策略是否存在折價效果?─流動性溢酬與交叉補貼之取捨zh_TW
dc.titleDoes Diversification Destroy Firm Value? - Trade-off between Liquidity Premium and Cross-subsidizationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department財務金融研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis