Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tzu-Pinen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chien-Chihen_US
dc.contributor.authorTong, Lun-Taoen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ping-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yi-Chiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorDong, Tien-Hsingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Hsin-Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chih-Pingen_US
dc.contributor.authorYang, Kai-Hsingen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Ching-Jenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Shih-Nanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T02:59:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T02:59:30Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0926-9851en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.07.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/128267-
dc.description.abstractThis study employed the combination of three methods, namely the Frequency Domain Electromagnetic (FDEM), Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to evaluate a heavy-metal contaminated site for both pre- and post-remediation investigations. The main goals were to verify the position and the integrity of the underground storage tanks (UST), and to determine the effectiveness of remediation to ensure no contaminants remained at the site. In general, the GPR survey was effective at locating shallowly buried objects. However, due to the highly conductive nature of the heavy-metal laden sludge, the GPR signals were attenuated severely. Thus, the first attempt to use GPR in the pre-remediation investigation did not achieve the desired results and other methods were deployed. The existence of the UST and the sludge within were confirmed by ERT and the UST shape was mapped by FDEM. The principal remediation scheme was soil replacement by replacing the contaminated soil with clean silt Based on the distinctive property differences of the contaminated soil and the clean silt, the completion of the remediation was confirmed by the differences between pre-remediation and post-remediation in GPR, ERT and FDEM results. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGPRen_US
dc.subjectERTen_US
dc.subjectEMen_US
dc.subjectSoil pollutionen_US
dc.subjectRemediation evaluationen_US
dc.titleApplying FDEM, ERT and GPR at a site with soil contamination: A case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.07.005en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICSen_US
dc.citation.volume121en_US
dc.citation.spage21en_US
dc.citation.epage30en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000361409200003en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles